Quote Originally Posted by R13 View Post
I think it's high.

Of course they wouldn't say something stupid like that. But saying "We've had a history of vandalism." is extremely logical thing to tell him. Yeah, get real. Though the fact that the last act was so long ago, it makes your point even more irrelevant.

And when have I ever said anything to that nature? That's right, I haven't. Never said anything of the sort and nothing I've said about Christianity has been off base.
and I think it's low.....

No they wouldn't say something "stupid" like that and 3 times in fifty years would probably not warrant a warning of "a history of vandalism" BUT given the number of churches in the U.S. it still averages out to my estimate.

I think you are spitting into the wind with trying to convince anyone on here that your previous posts have done anything but make it clear that you hate Christians and Christianity.


NOW, to the real issue. The point of your original post. Are you now ready to admit that you were wrong? The point of your post was that if a vandalism such as took place in North Carolina involving an atheist sign and as reported by a WORLDWIDE news service had instead involved a Christian sign then "we would have never heard the end of how they're (Christians) picked on.

I have shown beyond any doubt that like events have occurred many times (regardless of the number) to Christian based signs, and that not only did we "not hear the end of it" we never heard about it at all. The only stories that could be found were local news blurbs, not WORLDWIDE news agency stories.

Besides that, no big issue was being made of it by the victims. This cannot be said for the whining, crying, woe is us atheist community (such as yourself).

So, are you ready to admit that your original point is incorrect or have you no honor at all?